Blog

10 Worst PR Disasters of 2025

As 2025 winds down, we’re taking stock of the year’s most high-profile public relations debacles — moments when reputations unraveled, brands scrambled, and the world watched. From Silicon Valley to outer space, no industry was immune to controversy. While the details of each crisis vary, one common thread emerges: in today’s media environment, how you respond matters just as much as what you did.

These ten incidents were not only damaging — they were defining. Here’s what happened, how the players responded, and what other leaders can learn from their missteps.

1. Coldplay “Kissgate”: Astronomer’s HR Meltdown Goes Viral

Crisis: In July, during a Coldplay concert, a kiss-cam moment captured Astronomer CEO Andy Byron and the company’s head of HR, Kristin Cabot, in a romantic embrace — setting off a firestorm once internet sleuths quickly connected the dots: the two were engaged in an extramarital affair. What began as a viral moment turned into a reputational landslide for the data analytics company.

Reaction: Both Byron and Cabot resigned days after the video surfaced. Astronomer hired Gwyneth Paltrow (Coldplay’s head singer Chris Martin’s ex-wife) as a “temporary spokesperson” issuing a statement shortly after the story had gone viral. The video sparked backlash, with critics calling it tone-deaf, while others praising its humor.

Lessons:  Humor rarely works in early-stage crisis response, so Astronomer’s strategy was bold to say the least. Using humor as an attempt to reset the conversation carries significant risk when stakeholders are still seeking clarity and accountability. In moments involving leadership conduct and workplace culture, organizations are generally better served by leading with facts, empathy, and decisive action before experimenting with creative or unconventional messaging.

2. American Eagle and Sydney Sweeney’s “Bad Genes” Campaign

Crisis: American Eagle teamed up with actress Sydney Sweeney on a denim campaign jokingly titled “Bad Genes,” which critics interpreted as tone-deaf and insensitive. The internet backlash was swift, with many accusing the brand and star of glamorizing controversial themes.

Reaction: While outrage swelled online, American Eagle’s foot traffic surged by 34% and social media followers spiked by over 300,000. Sweeney released a clarifying statement, but never issued an apology — and the brand leaned into the buzz without flinching.

Lessons: In a media environment where offense often leads to engagement, controversy isn’t always catastrophic. Confidence and steadfastness can sometimes defuse outrage better than apology. AE and Sweeney’s refusal to panic kept them in control of the narrative.

3. Justin Baldoni vs. Blake Lively: When a Film Promo Becomes a Courtroom Drama

Crisis: The stars of It Ends With Us became embroiled in a bitter public feud — filing dueling defamation lawsuits and, in Lively’s case, accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment. As legal proceedings played out in public, the film’s reputation tanked before its release.

Reaction: Public opinion split sharply as fans, industry figures, and legal analysts weighed in. Instead of generating excitement, the movie became a symbol of dysfunction, distrust, and reputational damage.

Lessons: Legal fights fought in the press rarely end well. When stars litigate in the court of public opinion, both brands and individuals suffer. The studio’s failure to contain the feud diluted the film’s appeal and linked its legacy to scandal.

4. Tesla’s Self-Driving Terminology Sparks Real-World Tragedy

Crisis: Tesla faced mounting backlash in 2025 as its “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” systems were implicated in multiple incidents — including a fatal crash in Florida. Public confusion over the difference between these two features, compounded by marketing language, led regulators and media to scrutinize the company’s safety claims.

Reaction: A jury held Tesla liable for $240 million in damages, and the NHTSA opened a formal investigation. Tesla responded by releasing a Q3 Safety Report emphasizing driver responsibility and defending its branding.

Lessons: Clear communication isn’t optional. Tesla’s product naming created dangerous misconceptions. Had they named Autopilot something more accurate — like “lane assist cruise control” — public confusion and regulatory blowback might have been avoided. Precision in language is a safety issue.

5. Miss Universe: A Pageant of Scandal

Crisis: The 2025 Miss Universe Pageant devolved into chaos amid accusations of rigging, favoritism, and even criminal connections. Judge Omar Harfouch alleged the top 30 finalists were pre-selected and that winner Fátima Bosch benefited from her father’s ties to a co-owner. Fourth-place contestant Olivia Yacé renounced her title, citing exclusion and disillusionment.

Reaction: Miss Universe denied all allegations but failed to proactively control the narrative. The delay in addressing rumors, paired with a swirl of additional claims — including drug trafficking links and poorly executed production — damaged the pageant’s credibility.

Lessons: Silence breeds suspicion. Especially in high-drama spaces like pageants, organizations must move swiftly to clarify facts, address concerns, and reinforce ethical standards. Transparency isn’t just ideal — it’s a necessity.

6. Blue Origin’s All-Female Space Flight Backfires

Crisis: Blue Origin launched an all-female celebrity spaceflight featuring Lauren Sánchez, Gayle King, Katy Perry, Amanda Nguyen, and Aisha Bowe. Framed as a milestone for women in STEM, the event drew fire for its environmental cost, elitism, and perceived superficiality.

Reaction: The passengers defended the flight as symbolic and scientific. But the optics — with camera crews focused on celebrities rather than scientists — made the mission feel like a vanity project.

Lessons: Messaging must match reality. A cause-driven narrative can’t survive when the visuals scream luxury and ego. Brands must anticipate perception gaps — especially when billions are being spent for 11 minutes of airtime.

7. Jimmy Kimmel Suspended Over Charlie Kirk Remarks

Crisis: Jimmy Kimmel faced suspension after making pointed jokes about the late Charlie Kirk during a monologue. ABC deemed the segment inappropriate, placing the show on a temporary hiatus.

Reaction: Viewers rallied behind Kimmel, citing free speech and comedic license. Upon returning, Kimmel issued a heartfelt monologue clarifying his intent and expressing regret without fully backing down.

Lessons: Timing matters. Satirizing the recently deceased — even public figures — requires extreme sensitivity. Kimmel’s misstep reinforces an old but relevant adage: “Speak no ill of the dead.”

8. Diddy’s Downfall

Crisis: Sean “Diddy” Combs’ year-long legal saga culminated in a prison sentence tied to prostitution-related charges. With over 60 lawsuits alleging sexual assault, trafficking, drug abuse, and violence, the breadth and gravity of the claims dominated headlines and permanently altered his public image.

Reaction: Brands swiftly cut ties. Public sentiment turned, and what once was a legacy in music became a case study in collapse. As with Weinstein and Cosby, the weight of cumulative allegations proved career-ending.

Lessons: No brand — personal or corporate — can withstand credible, repeated allegations of serious abuse. Trust, once shattered, is nearly impossible to rebuild.

9. FAA Meltdown During Government Shutdown

Crisis: The longest government shutdown in U.S. history (43 days) left the FAA in disarray. Thousands of air traffic controllers were furloughed or unpaid, leading to mass flight delays, cancellations, and growing public frustration.

Reaction: With minimal communication and limited authority, the FAA struggled to keep passengers informed. Airlines bore the brunt of public anger, despite having little control over the situation.

Lessons: Even when the cause is structural, communication is critical. In crises where operational control is limited, visibility and empathy become key. Ignoring the passenger experience only compounds the reputational damage.

10. Meta Rolls Back Moderation — and Trust

Crisis: Meta quietly ended several third-party fact-checking partnerships and relaxed its policies around hate speech and misinformation. Critics accused the company of abandoning vulnerable users in favor of platform growth.

Reaction: Civil rights organizations, lawmakers, and online safety advocates blasted the move. Reports of harassment and abuse on Meta platforms spiked. Meta stood by the decision as a defense of free speech.

Lessons: Users experience content moderation not as policy — but as protection. Remove it, and trust erodes. Platforms must balance open expression with safety, or risk becoming uninhabitable to their most vulnerable communities.

Final Thought

In a year dominated by AI breakthroughs, geopolitical shifts, and attention spans measured in seconds, public trust remains the ultimate currency. The biggest PR disasters of 2025 didn’t just expose mistakes — they revealed what happens when strategy, values, and messaging fall out of sync.

Reputation is built in quiet moments. It’s tested in loud ones. And every brand, no matter how big, is one crisis away from becoming a cautionary tale.

If you find yourself in the hot seat — or want to prepare before you are — contact Red Banyan to take control of the narrative before it takes control of you.

Explore more